Sow Contact Is a Major Driver in the Development of the Nasal Microbiota of Piglets
Open Access
Abstract
The nasal microbiota composition is associated with the health status of piglets. Sow-contact in early life is one of the factors influencing the microbial composition in piglets; however, its impact has never been assessed in the nasal microbiota of piglets reared in controlled environmental conditions. Nasal microbiota of weaning piglets in high-biosecurity facilities with different time of contact with their sows (no contact after farrowing, contact limited to few hours or normal contact until weaning at three weeks) was unveiled by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Contact with sows demonstrated to be a major factor affecting the nasal microbial composition of the piglets. The nasal microbiota of piglets that had contact with sows until weaning, but were reared in high biosecurity facilities, was richer and more similar to the previously described healthy nasal microbiota from conventional farm piglets. On the other hand, the nasal communities inhabiting piglets with no or limited contact with sows was different and dominated by bacteria not commonly abundant in this body site. Furthermore, the length of sow–piglet contact was also an important variable. In addition, the piglets raised in BSL3 conditions showed an increased richness of low-abundant species in the nasal microbiota. Artificially rearing in high biosecurity facilities without the contact of sows as a source of nasal colonizers had dramatic impacts on the nasal microbiota of weaning piglets and may introduce significant bias into animal research under these conditions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain (AGL2016-77361-R)
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- The biological stress of early weaned pigletsJournal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2013
- MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and UsabilityMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2013
- An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaeaThe ISME Journal, 2011
- Impact of training sets on classification of high-throughput bacterial 16s rRNA gene surveysThe ISME Journal, 2011
- FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large AlignmentsPLOS ONE, 2010
- BLAST+: architecture and applicationsBMC Bioinformatics, 2009
- Bacteroides: the Good, the Bad, and the Nitty-GrittyClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2007
- Quantitative and Qualitative β Diversity Measures Lead to Different Insights into Factors That Structure Microbial CommunitiesApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007
- UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial CommunitiesApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005
- Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1952