Computational Formulation of Orthodontic Tooth-Extraction Decisions
Authors:
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation) in The Angle Orthodontist
- Vol. 79 (5) , 885-891
Abstract
Objective: To develop a mathematical model that simulates whether or not to extract teeth in optimizing orthodontic treatment outcome and to formulate the morphologic traits sensitive to optimizing the tooth-extraction/nonextraction decisions. Materials and Methods: A total of 188 conventional orthodontic records of patients with good treatment outcomes were collected, and dentofacial morphologic traits, along with their degrees of influence in the optimized model, were determined. Results: The rate of coincidence between the recommendations given by the optimized model and the actual treatments performed was found to be 90.4%. The major morphologic traits and their corresponding influences in improving the simulation accuracy of the model were the incisor overjet (3.0) and the size of the basal arch relative to the sum of the mesiodistal crown diameters of the upper dentition (2.4) and the lower dentition (2.0). The remaining 22 morphologic-trait variables were also found to be indispensable in achieving robust simulation readings. Conclusion: A mathematical model that simulates whether or not to extract teeth in optimizing orthodontic treatment outcomes with a success rate of 90.4% at its prediction performance was developed. This model has 25 morphologic traits with four major categories (sagittal dentoskeletal and soft tissue relationship, vertical dentoskeletal relationship, transverse dental relationship, and intra-arch conditions) that affected the accuracy in determining optimal tooth extractions/nonextractions.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- To extract or not to extract: A diagnostic decision, not a marketing decisionAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2008
- Spatial Relationships between the Mandibular Central Incisor and Associated Alveolar Bone in Adults with Mandibular PrognathismThe Angle Orthodontist, 2007
- Knowledge-Dependent Pattern Classification of Human Nasal ProfilesThe Angle Orthodontist, 2007
- An inference modeling of human visual judgment of sagittal jaw-base relationships based on cephalometry: Part IIAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000
- The validation of an orthodontic expert system rule-base for fixed appliance treatment planningEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1998
- Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisionsEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1996
- The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standardsEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1992
- A computer-controlled expert system for orthodontic adviceBritish Dental Journal, 1987
- Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1968
- Cephalometrics for you and meAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1953