Learning, exploitation and bias in games
Open Access
- 5 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (2) , e0246588
Abstract
We focus on learning during development in a group of individuals that play a competitive game with each other. The game has two actions and there is negative frequency dependence. We define the distribution of actions by group members to be an equilibrium configuration if no individual can improve its payoff by unilaterally changing its action. We show that at this equilibrium, one action is preferred in the sense that those taking the preferred action have a higher payoff than those taking the other, more prosocial, action. We explore the consequences of a simple ‘unbiased’ reinforcement learning rule during development, showing that groups reach an approximate equilibrium distribution, so that some achieve a higher payoff than others. Because there is learning, an individual’s behaviour can influence the future behaviour of others. We show that, as a consequence, there is the potential for an individual to exploit others by influencing them to be the ones to take the non-preferred action. Using an evolutionary simulation, we show that population members can avoid being exploited by over-valuing rewards obtained from the preferred option during learning, an example of a bias that is ‘rational’.Keywords
Funding Information
- Vetenskapsrådet (2018-03772)
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards a richer evolutionary game theoryJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2013
- Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma contains strategies that dominate any evolutionary opponentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Is optimism optimal? Functional causes of apparent behavioural biasesBehavioural Processes, 2012
- Do we expect natural selection to produce rational behaviour?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007
- Why cooperate?Behavioural Processes, 2004
- Learning Rules for Social Foragers: Implications for the Producer–Scrounger Game and Ideal Free Distribution TheoryJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2000
- An evolutionary approach to explaining cooperative behavior by reciprocal incentivesInternational Journal of Game Theory, 1995
- Learning rules, matching and frequency dependenceJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1987
- Learning the evolutionarily stable strategyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1981
- The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviourJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1980