A Clinical, Radiographic, and Cost Comparison of Cerclage Techniques: Wires vs Cables
Authors:
- Joseph D. LutgringJLJoseph D. Lutgring
- Kenneth E. DavisKDKenneth E. Davis
- Michael E. BerendMBMichael E. Berend
- John B. MedingJMJohn B. Meding
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 21 (7) , 1064-1067
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraoperative hip fracturesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004
- Impaction Allografting for Femoral Component RevisionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2004
- Management of periprosthetic femoral fracturesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2003
- An algorithm for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic proximal femoral fracturesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2002
- Proximal Femoral Allografts for Reconstruction of Bone Stock in Revision Arthroplasty of the HipJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- Cerclage wiring technique after proximal femoral fracture in total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1999
- Implant stability in revision total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1997
- Comparison of cerclage techniques using a hose clamp versus monofilament cerclage wire or cableThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1997
- Surgical management of intra- and postoperative fractures of the femur about the tip of the stem in total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996
- Hoop-stress fractures of the proximal femur during hip arthroplasty. Management and results in 19 casesThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1992