Twelve tips for data extraction for knowledge syntheses
- 2 September 2025
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Medical Teacher
- Vol. 48 (3) , 364-372
Abstract
In medical education, the number of knowledge syntheses has increased dramatically, reflecting their growth and influence on education practice, research, and policy. However, despite the availability of instruction on many of the steps of conducting knowledge syntheses, practical guidance for the critical step of data extraction is limited. Data extraction is the process of systematically identifying and collecting information from the studies included in a knowledge synthesis. Without clear guidance, data extraction can become flawed and overly time-consuming, ultimately jeopardizing the quality of the knowledge synthesis. This article addresses this gap by offering 12 practical tips for data extraction. The tips are grounded in the literature and informed by the authors' collective experience conducting and mentoring knowledge synthesis projects. Organized into two sections, creating a data extraction tool and operationalizing it, the tips provide actionable guidance on aligning extraction with research objectives, supporting a team-based approach, resolving discrepancies, and how to pilot a data extraction tool. Taken together, these tips aim to improve the rigor, efficiency, and reliability of knowledge synthesis in medical education.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Leveraging AI to improve evidence synthesis in conservationTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2024
- Impact of Mentoring for Underrepresented Groups in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Surgical Education, 2023
- Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a surveyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2023
- Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
- Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysisPerspectives on Medical Education, 2020
- Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions educationPerspectives on Medical Education, 2020
- A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case studyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
- Social media in knowledge translation and education for physicians and trainees: a scoping reviewPerspectives on Medical Education, 2019
- Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean DifferencesJAMA, 2007
- Twelve tips for undertaking a systematic reviewMedical Teacher, 2002