Homophily, networks, and critical mass: Solving the start-up problem in large group collective action
Author:
- 18 February 2013
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Rationality and Society
- Vol. 25 (1) , 3-40
Abstract
Formal theories of collective action face the problem that in large groups a single actor makes such a small impact on the collective good that cooperation is irrational. Critical mass theorists argue that this ‘large group problem’ can be solved by an initial critical mass of contributors, whose efforts can produce a ‘bandwagon’ effect, making cooperation rational for the remaining members of the population. However, critical mass theory requires an explanation of how a critical mass can form in the first place. I present a model of collective action that solves this problem by showing how aspects of social structure – including network topology, homophily, and local coalition formation – can allow rational actors to endogenously form a critical mass. The findings indicate that as the mobilization effort becomes more ‘complex’, clustered networks and homophily become increasingly important for critical mass collective action.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamics and Stability of Collective Action NormsThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2008
- Birds of Moderately Different Feathers: Bandwagon Dynamics and the Threshold Heterogeneity of Network NeighborsThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2007
- Collective Action, Rival Incentives, and the Emergence of Antisocial NormsAmerican Sociological Review, 2006
- A generalized model of social and biological contagionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2005
- Universal Behavior in a Generalized Model of ContagionPhysical Review Letters, 2004
- Group Beneficial Norms Can Spread Rapidly in a Structured PopulationJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2002
- Emotional Energy as the Common Denominator of Rational ActionRationality and Society, 1993
- A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective ActionAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1985
- Threshold Models of Collective BehaviorAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1978
- The Strength of Weak TiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973