The Importance of the Back‐office for Farm Advisory Services
- 16 April 2013
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Eurochoices
- Vol. 12 (1) , 21-26
Abstract
Summary: The Importance of the Back‐office for Farm Advisory ServicesAdvisory services must deal with new challenges. On the one hand, there is increasing uncertainty as to which agronomic systems and practices can enable farmers to integrate environmental and food safety issues e.g. pesticide use reduction, and to secure the economic performance of their farms. On the other hand, European agriculture is still characterised by a huge structural diversity in terms of farm size, level of specialisation or diversification, pluriactivity of agricultural households, etc. Such farm diversity generates a need for a variety of adapted technical solutions even when famers are confronted with a similar problem, e.g. how to cope with the diversification of crop rotation constraints. Thus, it is crucial to provide the diverse groups of farmers with empirical evidence on the effectiveness of alternative practices in their specific context of production. This article merges debates on the investments needed to produce relevant and robust evidence with those concerning the ongoing transformation induced by the privatisation of agricultural extension systems. It argues that if networking and brokering are key elements of the functioning of these systems, stronger attention should be given to back‐office activities e.g. technology monitoring, training advisors, and production, collection and storage of technical knowledge.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Privatization of agricultural extension services in the EU: Towards a lack of adequate knowledge for small-scale farms?Food Policy, 2013
- Building knowledge systems for sustainable agriculture: supporting private advisors to adequately address sustainable farm management in regular service contactsInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2010
- Extension services and multifunctional agriculture. Lessons learnt from the French and Dutch contexts and approachesJournal of Environmental Management, 2009
- Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediariesFood Policy, 2008
- Agricultural Extension Services and Market Regulation: Learning from a Comparison of Six EU CountriesThe Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2006
- Contracting for agricultural extenison: international case studies and emerging practices2002
- THE CHARACTERIZATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACHReview of Income and Wealth, 2000