Comparative visual function in four piscivorous fishes inhabiting Chesapeake Bay
Open Access
- 15 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 213 (10) , 1751-1761
Abstract
Maintaining optimal visual performance is a difficult task in photodynamic coastal and estuarine waters because of the unavoidable tradeoffs between luminous sensitivity and spatial and temporal resolution, yet the visual systems of coastal piscivores remain understudied despite differences in their ecomorphology and microhabitat use. We therefore used electroretinographic techniques to describe the light sensitivities, temporal properties and spectral sensitivities of the visual systems of four piscivorous fishes common to coastal and estuarine waters of the western North Atlantic: striped bass (Morone saxatilis), bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix), summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) and cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Benthic summer flounder exhibited higher luminous sensitivity and broader dynamic range than the three pelagic foragers. The former were at the more sensitive end of an emerging continuum for coastal fishes. By contrast, pelagic species were comparatively less sensitive, but showed larger day–night differences, consistent with their use of diel light-variant photic habitats. Flicker fusion frequency experiments revealed significant interspecific differences at maximum intensities that correlated with lifestyle and habitat. Spectral responses of most species spanned 400–610 nm, with significant day–night differences in striped bass and bluefish. Anadromous striped bass additionally responded to longer wavelengths, similar to many freshwater fishes. Collectively, these results suggest that pelagic piscivores are well adapted to bright photoclimates, which may be at odds with the modern state of eutrified coastal and estuarine waters that they utilize. Recent anthropogenic degradation of water quality in coastal environments, at a pace faster than the evolution of visual systems, may impede visually foraging piscivores, change selected prey, and eventually restructure ecosystems.Keywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative visual function in five sciaenid fishes inhabiting Chesapeake BayJournal of Experimental Biology, 2008
- Visual pigments of Baltic Sea fishes of marine and limnic originVisual Neuroscience, 2007
- Predator–prey encounter rates in freshwater piscivores: effects of prey density and water transparencyOecologia, 2007
- Evidence for visual constraints in large marine fish stocksLimnology and Oceanography, 2007
- Linking piscivory to spatial–temporal distributions of pelagic prey fishes with a visual foraging modelJournal of Fish Biology, 2006
- Temporal variability of optical properties in a shallow, eutrophic estuary: Seasonal and interannual variabilityEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2005
- Warm Eyes Provide Superior Vision in SwordfishesCurrent Biology, 2005
- Evaluation of the different levels of variability in the underwater light field of a shallow estuaryHelgoland Marine Research, 2001
- Effects of turbidity, light level and prey concentration on feeding of juvenile weakfish Cynoscion regalisMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1996
- On the Depth at Which Fish Can SeeEcology, 1936