Intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (Prasterone), a physiological and highly efficient treatment of vaginal atrophy
Authors:
- Fernand LabrieFLFernand Labrie
- David ArcherDADavid Archer
- Céline BouchardCBCéline Bouchard
- Michel FortierMFMichel Fortier
- Leonello CusanLCLeonello Cusan
- José-Luis GomezJGJosé-Luis Gomez
- Ginette GirardGGGinette Girard
- Mira BaronMBMira Baron
- Normand AyotteNANormand Ayotte
- Michèle MoreauMMMichèle Moreau
- Robert DubéRDRobert Dubé
- Isabelle CôtéICIsabelle Côté
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Menopause
- Vol. 16 (5) , 907-922
Abstract
Because the secretion of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), the exclusive source of sex steroids in postmenopausal women, is already decreased by 60% and continues to decline at the time of menopause, the objective of this study was to examine the effect of intravaginal DHEA on the symptoms and signs of vaginal atrophy. This prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial studied the effect of Prasterone (DHEA) applied locally in the vagina on the signs and symptoms of vaginal atrophy in 216 postmenopausal women. All three doses (0.25%, 0.5%, and 1.0%) of DHEA ovules applied daily intravaginally induced a highly significant beneficial change in the percentage of vaginal parabasal and superficial cells and pH as well as in the most bothersome symptom at 2 weeks. At the standard 12-week time interval, 0.5% DHEA caused a 45.9 +/- 5.31 (P < 0.0001 vs placebo) decrease in the percentage of parabasal cells, a 6.8 +/- 1.29% (P < 0.0001) increase in superficial cells, a 1.3 +/- 0.13 unit (P < 0.0001) decrease in vaginal pH, and a 1.5 +/- 0.14 score unit (P < 0.0001) decrease in the severity of the most bothersome symptom. Similar changes were seen on vaginal secretions, color, epithelial surface thickness, and epithelial integrity. Comparable effects were observed at the 0.25% and 1.0% DHEA doses. Local Prasterone, through local androgen and estrogen formation, causes a rapid and efficient reversal of all the symptoms and signs of vaginal atrophy with no or minimal changes in serum steroids, which remain well within the normal postmenopausal range. This approach avoids the fear of systemic effects common to all presently available estrogen formulations and adds a novel physiological androgenic component to therapy.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer SurvivorsJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- A Common 8q24 Variant and the Risk of Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Case-Control StudyCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2008
- Menopause hormone replacement therapy and cancer risk: an Italian record linkage investigationAnnals of Oncology, 2007
- The role of local vaginal estrogen for treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal womenMenopause, 2007
- Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women Using Estrogen-Only TherapyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy: the Million Women StudyThe Lancet, 2003
- Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2002
- Hormone Replacement Therapy and the Risk of Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Swedish WomenJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Estrogen Replacement Therapy and Ovarian Cancer Mortality in a Large Prospective Study of US WomenJAMA, 2001
- Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52 705 women with breast cancer and 108 411 women without breast cancerThe Lancet, 1997