Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Surgical Risk Patients: An Update
Open Access
- 12 May 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 272, 77-86
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Santé
- McGill University
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transcatheter or Surgical Treatment of Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low to Intermediate RiskJAMA Cardiology, 2025
- Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Lower-Risk PatientsJACC, 2025
- Long-Term Results Following Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized TrialsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2024
- Meta-Analysis on the Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Low-Surgical Risk Patients With Bicuspid Aortic ValvesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2022
- National Trends in TAVR and SAVR for Patients With Severe Isolated Aortic StenosisJACC, 2022
- Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Surgical Risk PatientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2020
- Clinical Features, Predictors, and Long-Term Prognosis of Pacing-Induced CardiomyopathyEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2019
- Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve StenosisJACC, 2015
- Contemporary Real-World Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in 141,905 Low-Risk, Intermediate-Risk, and High-Risk PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2015
- Comparison of Balloon-Expandable vs Self-expandable Valves in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementJAMA, 2014