Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis. A Systematic Review Literature
Open Access
- 22 November 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in International Journal of Rheumatology
- Vol. 2011, 1-6
Abstract
The cost effectiveness of treatments that have changed the “natural history” of a chronic progressive disease needs to be evaluated over the long term. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the standard treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and should be started as early as possible. A number of studies have shown that they are effective in improving disease activity and function, and in joint damage. Our review was focused on revision and critical evaluation of the studies including the literature on cost effectiveness of DMARDs (cyclosporine A, sulphasalazine, leflunomide, and methotrexate). The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations showed that traditional DMARDs are cost effective at the time of disease onset. They are less expensive than biological DMARDs and can be useful in controlling disease activity in early RA.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment strategies aiming at remission in early rheumatoid arthritis patients: starting with methotrexate monotherapy is cost-effectiveRheumatology, 2011
- Efficacy of methotrexate in comparison to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis.2010
- Cost‐effectiveness of biologic response modifiers compared to disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic reviewArthritis Care & Research, 2010
- Cost effectiveness analysis of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritisRheumatology International, 2007
- Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis in GermanyPharmacoEconomics, 2005
- Indirect and total costs of early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine with sulfasalazine alone.2004
- Cost effectiveness of adding leflunomide to a 5-year strategy of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Modeling the progression of rheumatoid arthritis: A two‐country model to estimate costs and consequences of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Economic Comparison of Leflunomide and Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid ArthritisPharmacoEconomics, 2002
- Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: randomized comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone. COBRA Trial Group. Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide ArtritisRheumatology, 1998