Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer
Open Access
- 1 September 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 95 (39) , e4801
Abstract
Recently, increasing relevant studies researched the efficacy of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients using chemotherapy with or without estramustine, in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of combining estramustine with chemotherapy for the treatment of CRPC. Relevant randomized clinical trials were systematically searched from the databases Pubmed, Embase, and Web of science up to April 1, 2016. Data were centrally extracted and analyzed from the previous studies by 2 independent reviewers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with pooled hazard ratios. Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and grade 3 or 4 toxicity using pooled odds ratios. Stata version 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Overall, this meta-analysis identified 9 eligible articles, including a total of 956 patients, who had been accrued between January 1, 1993 and December 1, 2010 and randomly divided into chemotherapy with estramustine and without estramustine. Chemotherapy (with or without estramustine) consisted of docetaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, epirubicin, and vinblastine. Patients who received chemotherapy with estramustine had a better improvement in PSA response rate, comparing those without estramustine (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.20-2.80). However, OS between the 2 groups indicated no significant differences (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77-1.05). Besides, these results of meta-analysis showed no obvious differences between these 2 groups in grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, including anemia (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.38-1.57), neutropenia (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.59-1.43), thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.19-2.42), nausea (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 0.81-6.72), vomiting (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 0.69-8.51), diarrhea (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 0.93-12.76), fatigue (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.32-1.41), neuropathy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.21-1.44), allergic reaction (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.37-6.84), thromboembolic event (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.86-5.51), and edema (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.18-5.95). This meta-analysis indicated chemotherapy with additional estramustine increased the PSA response rate. However, OS and grade 3 or 4 toxicity were not improved for these patients with CRPC.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Docetaxel with or without estramustine for estramustine refractory castration-resistant prostate cancer: a single institution experienceBMC Urology, 2012
- Small Molecule Inhibitors Targeting the “Achilles' Heel” of Androgen Receptor ActivityCancer Research, 2011
- An update on androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancerEndocrine-Related Cancer, 2010
- Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Docetaxel, Estramustine, and Prednisone With Docetaxel and Prednisone in Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Docetaxel, with or without estramustine phosphate, as first‐line chemotherapy for hormone‐refractory prostate cancer: results of a multicentre, randomized phase II trialBJU International, 2008
- Addition of estramustine to chemotherapy and survival of patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient dataThe Lancet Oncology, 2007
- Randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus estramustine and single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancerAnnals of Oncology, 2007
- Hoosier Oncology Group Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel, Vinorelbine, and Estramustine in Combination in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer with Pharmacogenetic Survival AnalysisClinical Cancer Research, 2006
- Estramustine Phosphate SodiumDrugs & Aging, 1995
- Change in White Cell Count during Treatment of Advanced Cancer of the Prostate with Estramustine Phosphate and with StilboestrolBritish Journal of Urology, 1983