Two‐surface versus multi‐surface plasticity theories: A critical assessment
Author:
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
- Vol. 6 (3) , 323-338
Abstract
It is the objective of this note critically to assess the merits and shortcomings of two‐surface and multi‐surface plasticity theories.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Finite-Element Solution of Elastic-Plastic Boundary-Value ProblemsJournal of Applied Mechanics, 1981
- Application of an anisotropic hardening model in the analysis of elasto–plastic deformation of soilsGéotechnique, 1979
- Plasticity Theory for Soil Stress-Strain BehaviorJournal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1978
- Anisotropic Undrained Stress-Strain Behavior of ClaysJournal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1978
- An anisotropic hardening model for soils and its application to cyclic loadingInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1978
- Mathematical modelling of monotonic and cyclic undrained clay behaviourInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1977
- On the description of anisotropic workhardeningJournal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1967
- The Theory of Plasticity: A Survey of Recent AchievementsProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1955
- Zur Plastizität des räumlichen KontinuumsArchive of Applied Mechanics, 1938