Effects of Timing and Intensity of Neurorehabilitation on Functional Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors:
- 1 June 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Vol. 99 (6) , 1149-1159.e1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Daan Theeuwes Foundation and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (022.003.010)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: a population-based studyThe Lancet Neurology, 2013
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- The Design of Cluster Randomized Crossover TrialsJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2011
- The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMC Medicine, 2010
- Effect of a regular family visiting program as an affective, auditory, and tactile stimulation on the consciousness level of comatose patients with a head injuryJapan Journal of Nursing Science, 2009
- Motor impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal multicenter studyJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2007
- Does intensive rehabilitation improve the functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI)? A randomized controlled trialBrain Injury, 2007
- Outcome of a Comprehensive Neurorehabilitation Program for Patients With Traumatic Brain InjuryArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2005
- Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004
- Writing meta-analytic reviews.Psychological Bulletin, 1995