Penile Fracture: A Meta-Analysis
Authors:
- Rebekah WilsonRWRebekah Wilson
- Piotr ChlostaPCPiotr Chlosta
- Salah AlBuheissiSASalah AlBuheissi
- Hasan QaziHQHasan Qazi
- Michael FraserMFMichael Fraser
- Omar M. AboumarzoukOAOmar M. Aboumarzouk
- 1 March 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Urologia Internationalis
- Vol. 96 (3) , 315-329
Abstract
Objectives: To review the causes and management of penile fracture and to compare between surgical and conservative management as well as immediate and delayed interventions in terms of overall and specific complications. Methods: A search of all reported literature was conducted for all articles reporting on the management and outcomes of penile fractures. Full texts of relevant articles were obtained and screened according to the inclusion criteria. Outcomes measures were numbers of patients receiving surgical or conservative management, aetiology of fracture, length of admission, complications as well as the specifics of diagnostic approaches and operative management. Data was collated and where possible meta-analysed using Revman software. Results: A total of 58 relevant studies involving 3,213 patients demonstrated that intercourse accounts for only 48% of cases with masturbation and forced flexion accounting for 39%. Meta-analysis shows that surgical intervention was associated with significantly fewer complications vs. conservative management (p < 0.000001). Surgical intervention results in significantly less erectile dysfunction (ED), curvature and painful erection than conservative management. There was no significant difference in the number of patients developing plaques/nodules (p = 0.94). Meta-analysis shows that overall early surgery is preferable to delayed surgery but that rates of ED are not significantly different. Discussion: Early surgical intervention is associated with significantly fewer complications than conservative management or delayed surgery. The combined outcome of rapid diagnosis by history and clinical examination and swift surgical intervention is key for reconstruction with minimal long-term complications.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sexual function outcomes following fracture of the penis.Canadian Urological Association Journal, 2013
- Long-term Treatment Outcomes Between Surgical Correction and Conservative Management for Penile Fracture: Retrospective AnalysisKorean Journal of Urology, 2013
- Surgical Repair and Analysis of Penile Fracture ComplicationsUrologia Internationalis, 2011
- The diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture: our 19-year experienceTurkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2011
- Surgical or conservative treatment of penile fractureActa chirurgica Iugoslavica, 2008
- Urogenital TraumaInternational braz j urol, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- SURGEON EXPERIENCE WITH PENILE FRACTUREJournal of Urology, 2001
- Experience with Penile Fractures in Saudi ArabiaBritish Journal of Urology, 1991
- Fracture of the Penis and Long‐term Results of Surgical TreatmentBritish Journal of Urology, 1986