Repair of restorations – Criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations
Authors:
- Reinhard HickelRHReinhard Hickel
- Katrin BrüshaverKBKatrin Brüshaver
- Nicoleta IlieNicoleta Ilie
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Dental Materials
- Vol. 29 (1) , 28-50
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal–ceramic fixed dental prosthesesDental Materials, 2012
- Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorationsEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, 2011
- Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: A microleakage studyIndian Journal of Dental Research, 2011
- How to repair fillings made by silorane-based compositesClinical Oral Investigations, 2010
- Repair or replacement of restorations: do we accept built in obsolescence or do we improve the evidence?British Dental Journal, 2010
- FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examplesClinical Oral Investigations, 2010
- Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resinsClinical Oral Investigations, 2010
- Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatmentsJournal of Dentistry, 2010
- Minimal intervention dentistry — a reviewInternational Dental Journal, 2000
- The tensile strength of composite repairsJournal of Dentistry, 1980