An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
Authors:
Open Access
- 16 June 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 6 (1) , 28242
Abstract
Numerous problems regarding craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery are not well understood. In this study, we performed a double-center clinical study to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of our navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery. Fifty-six patients with craniomaxillofacial disease were included and randomly divided into experimental (using our AccuNavi-A system) and control (using Strker system) groups to compare the surgical effects. The results revealed that the average pre-operative planning time was 32.32 mins vs 29.74 mins between the experimental and control group, respectively (p > 0.05). The average operative time was 295.61 mins vs 233.56 mins (p > 0.05). The point registration orientation accuracy was 0.83 mm vs 0.92 mm. The maximal average preoperative navigation orientation accuracy was 1.03 mm vs 1.17 mm. The maximal average persistent navigation orientation accuracy was 1.15 mm vs 0.09 mm. The maximal average navigation orientation accuracy after registration recovery was 1.15 mm vs 1.39 mm between the experimental and control group. All patients healed and their function and profile improved. These findings demonstrate that although surgeons should consider the patients’ time and monetary costs, our qualified navigation surgery system and experience could offer an accurate guide during a variety of craniomaxillofacial surgeries.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical Navigation in ReconstructionOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 2013
- Navigation-Guided Correction of Midfacial Post-Traumatic Deformities (Shanghai Experience With 40 Cases)Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012
- Surgical Navigation in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: Expensive Toy or Useful Tool? A Classification of Different IndicationsJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011
- A surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery and its application in the treatment of old zygomatic fracturesThe International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2010
- Stereotactic navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgeryBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010
- Navigation-Guided Reduction and Orbital Floor Reconstruction in the Treatment of Zygomatic-Orbital-Maxillary Complex FracturesJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010
- Computer-Assisted Planning, Stereolithographic Modeling, and Intraoperative Navigation for Complex Orbital Reconstruction: A Descriptive Study in a Preliminary CohortJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2009
- Computer modeling and navigation in maxillofacial surgeryCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 2009
- Computer modeling and intraoperative navigation in maxillofacial surgeryOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 2007
- Image-guided navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgeryBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2005