Dual Faces of Ministerial Leadership in South Korea: Does Political Responsiveness or Administrative Responsibility Enhance Perceived Ministerial Performance?
Authors:
- 5 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Administration & Society
- Vol. 42 (1_suppl)
Abstract
This study is designed to examine dual faces of ministerial leadership that functions in the gray area of politics and administration when a minister performs his or her role as a political appointee and as a department head. The dual faces of ministerial leadership require somehow both political responsiveness and administrative responsibility for effective ministerial performance. Using the perceptual data of middle- and high-ranked South Korean government officials collected from the 2002 and 2007 Korean Minister Surveys, this study attempts to understand the relationship between types of ministerial leadership and performance in agenda setting, policy implementation, and internal management. The results of this study show that president-centered ministerial leadership (political responsiveness) is positively associated with agenda-setting performance and policy implementation performance whereas department-centered leadership (administrative responsibility) is positively associated with all performance areas, including agenda setting, implementation, and internal management.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Presidential Environmental Appointees in Comparative PerspectivePublic Administration Review, 2008
- Exploring Charismatic Leadership in the Public Sector: Measurement and ConsequencesPublic Administration Review, 2003
- Ministers as double agents? The delegation process between cabinet and ministersEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2000
- Back to the Future? Senior Federal Executives in the United StatesGovernance, 1997
- Whitehall's Disobedient Servants? Senior Officials' Potential Resistance to Ministers in British Government DepartmentsBritish Journal of Political Science, 1997
- Institutions and Technological Development in Korea: The Role of the PresidencyComparative Politics, 1995
- Political Management Strategies and Polical/Career Relationships: Where Are We Now in the Federal Government?Public Administration Review, 1995
- The In-and-Outer System: A Critical AssessmentPolitical Science Quarterly, 1988
- Building Bridges or Burning Them? The President, the Appointees, and the BureaucracyPublic Administration Review, 1987
- Political Executives and the Washington BureaucracyPolitical Science Quarterly, 1977