WHAT FUELS SUBOPTIMAL CARE OF PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS IN HOSPITALS? – A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF DECISION-MAKING AMONG SPANISH NURSES
Preprint
Abstract
Background Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) are commonly used in hospital worldwide. However, PIVC are not exempt from complications. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) increase morbidity and mortality rates, and costs for the healthcare organization. PIVC care is shaped by the complex mix of professional and organizational culture, such as knowledge gaps, low perception of impact of PIVCs on patient safety, or lack of hospital guidelines. Aim To explore determinants of decision-making about the prevention of PIVC-BSI among nurses in Spanish hospitals. Methods We conducted a descriptive qualitative study with semi-structured interviews in three public hospitals, the Balearic Islands Health Care Service in Spain. We considered hospital ward nurses working routinely with inpatients at any of the three hospitals for enrolment in the study. We approached relevant informants to identify suitable participants who recruited other participants through a ‘snowball’ technique. Fourteen inpatient nurses from the hospital took part in this study between September and November 2018. We employed several triangulation strategies to underpin the methodological rigour of our analysis and conducted the member checking, showing the information and codes applied in the recording of the interviews to identify the coherence and any discrepancies of the discourse by participants. We used the COREQ checklist for this study. Findings We identified four major themes in the analysis related to determinants of care: The fog of decision-making in PIVC; The taskification of PIVC care; PIVC care is accepted to be suboptimal, yet irrelevant; and PIVC care gaps may reflect behavioural shortcomings, yet solutions proposed to involve education and training. Conclusion The clinical management of PIVCs appear ambiguous, unclear, and fragmented, with no clear professional responsibility and no nurse leadership, causing a gap in preventing infections. Furthermore, the perception of low risk on PIVC care impact can cause a relevant lack of adherence to the best evidence and patient safety. Implementing facilitation strategies could improve the fidelity of the best available evidence regarding PIVC care and raise awareness among nurses of impact that excellence of care.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of a multimodal intervention to reduce bloodstream infections related to vascular catheters in non-ICU wards: a multicentre studyClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2013
- Vital Signs: Central Line–Associated Blood Stream Infections—United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2011
- Investigating stacking: How do registered nurses prioritize their activities in real-time?International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2011
- Registered Nurses' Adherence to Clinical Guidelines Regarding Peripheral Venous Catheters: A Structured Observational StudyWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2008
- Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and managementThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospitalJournal of Hospital Infection, 2007
- Too much guidance?The Lancet, 2005
- Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary careBMJ, 2004
- Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitationJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2002
- Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelinesThe Lancet, 2001