The global diet quality score as an indicator of adequate nutrient intake and dietary quality – a nation-wide representative study
Authors:
Open Access
- 17 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nutrition Journal
- Vol. 23 (1) , 1-14
Abstract
Background: The Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS) was developed to be a simple, timely and cost-effective tool to track, simultaneously, nutritional deficiency and non-communicable disease risks from diet in diverse settings. The objective was to investigate the performance of GDQS as an indicator of adequate nutrient intake and dietary quality in a national-representative sample of the Brazilian population. Methods: Nationally-representative data from 44,744 men and non-pregnant and non-lactating women aging ≥ 10 years, from the Brazilian National Dietary Survey were used. Dietary data were collected through two 24-h recalls (24HR). The GDQS was calculated and compared to a proxy indicator of nutrient adequate intake (the Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women—MDD-W) and to an indicator of high-risk diet for non-communicable diseases (caloric contribution from ultra-processed foods—UPF). To estimate the odds for overall nutrient inadequacy across MDD-W and GDQS quintiles, a multiple logistic regression was applied, and the two metrics’ performances were compared using Wald’s post-test. Results: The mean GDQS for Brazilians was 14.5 (0–49 possible range), and only 1% of the population had a low-risk diet (GDQS ≥ 23). The GDQS mean was higher in women, elderly individuals and in higher-income households. An inverse correlation was found between the GDQS and UPF (rho (95% CI) = -0.20(-0.21;-0.19)). The odds for nutrient inadequacy were lower as quintiles of GDQS and MDD-W were higher (p-trend < 0.001), and MDD-W had a slightly better performance than GDQS (p-diff < 0.001). Having a low-risk GDQS (≥ 23) lowered the odds for nutrient inadequacy by 74% (95% CI:63%-81%). Conclusion: The GDQS is a good indicator of overall nutrient adequacy, and correlates well with UPF in a nationally representative sample of Brazil. Future studies must investigate the relationship between the GDQS and clinical endpoints, strengthening the recommendation to use this metric to surveillance dietary risks.Keywords
Funding Information
- São Paulo Research Foundation (2013/07607-8, 2013/07607-8, 2022/03091-6, 2013/07607-8, 2013/07607-8)
- National Institutes of Health (T32 DK 007703)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shifts towards overweight and double burden of malnutrition among socio-economically vulnerable children: a longitudinal ecological analysis of Brazilian municipalitiesPublic Health Nutrition, 2020
- Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysisBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2020
- Defining diet quality: a synthesis of dietary quality metrics and their validity for the double burden of malnutritionThe Lancet Planetary Health, 2020
- Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify themPublic Health Nutrition, 2019
- The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission reportThe Lancet, 2019
- Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systemsThe Lancet, 2019
- Alternative Dietary Indices Both Strongly Predict Risk of Chronic DiseaseThe Journal of Nutrition, 2012
- A mixed‐effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: The NCI methodStatistics in Medicine, 2010
- The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2008
- Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studiesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1997