Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service
Authors:
- Bh Al WattarBWBh Al Wattar
- Ukarcog MembersUMUkarcog Members
Open Access
- 27 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 127 (9) , 1123-1128
Abstract
Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic is disrupting health services worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic.Design: Interview‐based national survey.Setting: Women's healthcare units in the National Health Service.Population: Junior doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology.Methods: Participants were interviewed by members of the UK Audit and Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees' collaborative between 28 March and 7 April 2020. We used a quantitative analysis for closed‐ended questions and a thematic framework analysis for open comments.Results: We received responses from 148/155 units (95%), most of the participants were in years 3–7 of training (121/148, 82%). Most completed specific training drills for managing obstetric and gynaecological emergencies in women with COVID‐19 (89/148, 60.1%) and two‐person donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (96/148, 64.9%). The majority of surveyed units implemented COVID‐19‐specific protocols (130/148, 87.8%), offered adequate PPE (135/148, 91.2%) and operated dedicated COVID‐19 emergency theatres (105/148, 70.8%). Most units reduced face‐to‐face antenatal clinics (117/148, 79.1%) and suspended elective gynaecology services (131/148, 88.5%). The 2‐week referral pathway for oncological gynaecology was not affected in half of the units (76/148, 51.4%), but half reported a planned reduction in oncology surgery (82/148, 55.4%).Conclusion: The provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic seems to be in line with current guidelines, but strategic planning is needed to restore routine gynaecology services and ensure safe access to maternity care in the long term.Tweetable Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the acute phase of COVID‐19 is in line with current guidelines, strategic planning is needed to restore routine services and ensure safe access to care in the long term.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Response to COVID-19 in TaiwanJAMA, 2020
- COVID-19—New Insights on a Rapidly Changing EpidemicJAMA, 2020
- Impact of Wars and Conflicts on Women and Children in Middle East: Health, Psychological, Educational and Social CrisisEuropean Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 2017
- Medium-term impact of the economic crisis on mortality, health-related behaviours and access to healthcare in GreeceScientific Reports, 2017
- ‘Women and babies are dying but not of Ebola’: the effect of the Ebola virus epidemic on the availability, uptake and outcomes of maternal and newborn health services in Sierra LeoneBMJ Global Health, 2016
- The Impact of the West Africa Ebola Outbreak on Obstetric Health Care in Sierra LeonePLOS ONE, 2016
- Maternal mortality due to pandemic influenza A H1N1 2009 virus in ColombiaJournal of Perinatal Medicine, 2013
- Influenza A/H1N1v in pregnancy: an investigation of the characteristics and management of affected women and the relationship to pregnancy outcomes for mother and infant.Health Technology Assessment, 2010
- The 1918 Influenza Pandemic and Subsequent Health Outcomes: An Analysis of SIPP DataAmerican Economic Review, 2005
- Mortality, Violence and Lack of Access to Healthcare in the Democratic Republic of CongoDisasters, 2003