Medical students and ChatGPT: analyzing attitudes, practices, and academic perceptions
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 February 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
Background: ChatGPT, a chatbot launched by OpenAI in November 2022, has generated both excitement and concern within the healthcare education, research, and practice communities. This study aimed to explore the knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and practices of undergraduate medical students regarding the use of ChatGPT and similar chatbots in their academic work. Methods: An anonymous, structured questionnaire was developed using Google Forms and administered to medical students as part of a cross-sectional study. The survey targeted undergraduate medical students from four governorates in Egypt. The questionnaire link was distributed through social media platforms, including Facebook and WhatsApp. The survey comprised four sections: socio-demographic characteristics, perceptions, attitudes, and practices. Results: The survey achieved a response rate of 96%, with 614 out of 640 approached students participating. Prior to the study, most respondents (78.5%) had personal experience using it. Overall, respondents demonstrated positive perceptions, attitudes, and practices toward ChatGPT, with mean scores exceeding 3 for all three variables: 3.99 ± 0.60 for perceptions, 3.01 ± 0.46 for attitudes, and 3.55 ± 0.55 for practices. In general, the students exhibited a high degree of trust in the model, with approximately half trusting the accuracy and reliability of the information provided by ChatGPT. However, more than two-thirds expressed apprehension about its potential misuse in medical education, and around 60% were concerned about the accuracy of information ChatGPT might generate on complex medical topics. Conclusions: Medical students show strong interest and trust in using ChatGPT and similar chatbots for academic purposes but have concerns about the reliability of the information and potential misuse in medical education. The use of AI tools should follow ethical guidelines set by academic institutions, with regular updates to keep pace with technological progress. Future research should focus on the impact of AI on education and personal development, especially among young people.Keywords
Funding Information
- Cairo University
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring the risks of automation bias in healthcare artificial intelligence applications: A Bowtie analysisJournal of Safety Science and Resilience, 2024
- Knowledge, Perceptions and Attitude of Researchers Towards Using ChatGPT in ResearchJournal of Medical Systems, 2024
- How Chatbots and Large Language Model Artificial Intelligence Systems Will Reshape Modern MedicineJAMA Internal Medicine, 2023
- The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical educationAnatomical Sciences Education, 2023
- Attention is not all you need: the complicated case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicineEBioMedicine, 2023
- What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for scienceNature, 2023
- ChatGPT: five priorities for researchNature, 2023
- Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their useNature, 2023
- Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?Nurse Education in Practice, 2022
- AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays — should professors worry?Nature, 2022