Evaluating a ten questions screen for childhood disability: Reliability and internal structure in different cultures
Authors:
- W. WangWWW. Wang
- P.E. ShroutPSP.E. Shrout
- S.S. ZamanSZS.S. Zaman
- Z.M. HasanZHZ.M. Hasan
- P. DesaiPDP. Desai
- L.L. DavidsonLDL.L. Davidson
Open Access
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 48 (5) , 657-666
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of the Ten Questions Screen for Childhood DisabilityEpidemiology, 1994
- Identification of childhood disability in JamaicaInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1992
- Estimates of the prevalence of childhood seizure disorders in communities where professional resources are scarce: results from Bangladesh, Jamaica and PakistanPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1992
- A comparison of efficacy of the key informant and community survey methods in the identification of childhood disability in JamaicaAnnals of Epidemiology, 1991
- Validity of the ‘Ten Questions’ for Screening Serious Childhood Disability: Results from Urban BangladeshInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1990
- Reliability and validity of screening scales: Effect of reducing scale lengthJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENTJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Recent Developments in the Factor Analysis of Categorical VariablesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1986
- USE OF THE MENTAL FUNCTION INDEX IN OLDER ADULTS: RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND MEASUREMENT OF CHANGE OVER TIMEAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1984
- Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of TestsPsychometrika, 1951