Is This ACP? A Focus Group Study of Patient Experiences of Advance Care Planning

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background To date, most research on patients’ experiences with advance care planning (ACP) focuses on motivations to engage in discussions and how patients prepare. Gaps remain in understanding how non-critically ill Medicare patients perceive ACP encounters, including how they characterize positive and negative experiences with ACP. Objectives Understanding these patients’ perceptions is imperative as Medicare has sought to incentivize provision of ACP services via two billing codes in 2016. Design Qualitative focus group study. Thematic analysis was performed to assess participants ACP experience. Participants Medicare beneficiaries who had engaged in or were billed for ACP. Key Results Seven focus groups were conducted with 34 Medicare beneficiaries who had engaged in ACP across 5 US health systems. Participants described a spectrum of perceptions regarding ACP, and a range of delivery approaches, including group ACP, discussions with specialists during serious illness, and ACP in primary care settings during wellness visits. Despite being billed for ACP or having ACP services noted in their medical record, many did not recognize that they had engaged in ACP, expressed lack of clarity over the term “ACP,” and were unaware of the Medicare billing codes. Among participants who described quality patient-centered ACP experiences, three additional themes were identified: trusted and established patient/clinician relationships, transparent communication and documentation, and an understanding that ACP is revisable. Participants offered recommendations for clinicians and health systems to improve the patient ACP experience. Conclusions Findings include actionable steps to promote patient-centered ACP experiences, including clinician training to support improved communication and facilitating shared decision-making, allocating sufficient clinical time for discussions, and ensuring that documentation of preferences is clear and accessible. Other approaches such as group ACP and ACP navigators may help to support patient interests within clinical constraints and need to be further explored.
Funding Information
  • National Institutes of Health (R017034)

This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit: