Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004
Authors:
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 22 (5) , 1181-1187
Abstract
Background Over the past 5 years, several studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic colon resection is an acceptable and perhaps preferable alternative to open resection for both benign diseases and cancer. The extent to which laparoscopic colon resections are used nationally is not known. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify laparoscopic and open elective colon resections performed in the United States each year from 2000 through 2004. The trends in adoption of the laparoscopic technique for each type of colon resection and for the most common diagnoses were identified, and differences in patient and provider characteristics were examined. Results From 2000 to 2004, the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically increased from 3% to 6.5%. The proportion performed for cancer increased from 1.4% to 4.3%, and for benign disease from 4.6% to 8.2%. Patients treated laparoscopically tended to be younger (median age, 61 years vs 66 years; p < 0.001) and to have fewer comorbidities (Charlson score of zero for 58.1% vs 37%; p < 0.001). Laparoscopic colon resections were more widely adopted in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals (5.1% vs 3.7%; p < 0.001) and in urban versus rural hospitals (4.7% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001). Conclusion Although the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically increased in the first half of this decade, it has remained very low. This trend is similar across procedure types and diagnoses. It remains to be seen whether greater patient demand and more recent trials will result in wider adoption of the laparoscopic approach.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Colon Surgery: Past, Present and FutureSurgical Clinics of North America, 2006
- Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Colorectal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Multidimensional Analysis of Learning Curves in Laparoscopic Sigmoid ResectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2003
- National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrenceThe Lancet, 1993