The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Industry and Innovation
- Vol. 15 (2) , 145-168
Abstract
Most research on open source software communities has focused on those that are community founded. More recently, firms have founded their own open source communities. How do sponsored open source communities differ from their autonomous counterparts? With comparative examination of 12 open source projects initiated by corporate sponsors, we identify three design parameters that together help form a participation architecture—the opportunity structure extended to potential external contributors. In exploring sponsors' community design decisions, we found that sponsored open source projects were more likely to offer transparency than they were accessibility and that this had implications for their communities' growth. We contribute theoretical constructs that offer a common basis of comparison for the future study of open source projects and illustrate how the tension between control and growth affects open source community design and creation.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodological fit in management field researchAcademy of Management Review, 2007
- Learning from leading-edge customers at The Sims: opening up the innovation process using toolkitsR&D Management, 2006
- Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source softwareR&D Management, 2006
- The Role of Individuals and Social Capital in POSIX StandardizationInternational Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, 2006
- The Scope of Open Source LicensingThe Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2005
- Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software ProjectsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Some Simple Economics of Open SourceThe Journal of Industrial Economics, 2002
- From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance FormationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2001
- Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological ChangeAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1990
- Industrial Reorganization and Social Democracy in AustriaIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1984