Comparison of clinical outcomes of a corneal wavefront- and topography-guided platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis on virgin eyes: an expanded cohort study
Authors:
Open Access
- 22 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Ophthalmology
- Vol. 44 (1) , 1-11
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of myopiacorrected with corneal-wavefront-guided (CWG) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with AMARIS 1050S (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH & Co. KG) and corneal-topography-guided (CTG) LASIK with WaveLight EX500 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX). Methods: In this prospective, pseudo-randomized expanded cohort study, a total of 266 patients were subjected to binocular LASIK surgery, either with WaveLight EX500 (WaveLight group) or Amaris 1050S (AMARIS group) platforms. Data related to right eyes were selected for analysis. Corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) was selected as the primary endpoint; while visual acuity and refraction were the secondary endpoints. All the endpoints were assessed at 3 months postoperatively. Results: There were 134 eyes in the AMARIS group and 132 eyes in the WaveLight group. After 3 months of postoperative follow-up, spherical and coma aberrations were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the WaveLight group (spherical aberration: − 0.104 ± 0.199 µm; coma aberration: − 0.117 ± 0.202 µm) in comparison with the AMARIS group (spherical aberrations: 0.254 ± 0.146 µm; coma aberrations: 0.316 ± 0.297 µm). In the AMARIS group, 96.3% of the eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 while in the WaveLight group, 96.2% of the eyes achieved an UDVA of 20/20. Furthermore, the mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was − 0.02 ± 0.28 in the AMARIS group and − 0.05 ± 0.21 in the WaveLight group (P = 0.34). Conclusions: Both WaveLight EX500 and Amaris 1050S LASIK showed excellent refractive and visual outcomes. In addition, the WaveLight group showed minimal spherical and coma aberrations when compared to the AMARIS group.Keywords
Funding Information
- Science Research Foundation of Aier Eye Hospital Group (AM169D04)
- Funded by Alcon Laboratories Pvt. Ltd (IIT # 52058705)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2019
- More eyes with 20/10 distance visual acuity at 12 months versus 3 months in a topography-guided excimer laser trial: Possible contributing factorsJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2018
- Recent advances in wavefront-guided LASIKCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2018
- Outcomes of topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia in virgin eyesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2016
- Correlation of higher order aberrations and components of astigmatism in myopic refractive surgery candidatesJournal of Current Ophthalmology, 2016
- Results of topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis custom ablation treatment with a refractive excimer laserJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2016
- Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser systemJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2014
- Femtosecond Lasers for LASIK Flap CreationOphthalmology, 2013
- Wavefront-guided customized corneal ablationCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2008
- Wavefront-Guided versus Standard LASIK Enhancement for Residual Refractive ErrorsOphthalmology, 2006