Challenges in Diagnosis of Uretero–Arterial Fistulas after Complex Pelvic Oncological Procedures—Single Center Experience and Review of the Literature
Open Access
- 29 July 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 12 (8) , 1832
Abstract
Introduction: Uretero–arterial fistula (UAF) represents a rare condition that manifests as massive or intermittent hematuria and requires collaboration between a urologist, vascular surgeon and interventional radiologist. In this article, we present our experience with UAF diagnosis, treatment pathways and the results of a nonsystematic review of the literature published in the last decade regarding modern diagnostic procedures. Material and method: We analyzed the clinical data of nine consecutive patients from our institution diagnosed with UAF in the interval of 2012–2022 who underwent open or endovascular surgical treatment. We reviewed patient characteristics, diagnoses and treatment pathways. The literature search resulted in 14 case series, published from 2012 to 2022, describing a total of 670 cases of UAF. Results: The mean age of patients in our cohort was 65.3 years (IQR: 51–79). UAFs were more common in women (77.7%). All patients presented a history of surgical intervention and ir-radiation for pelvic malignancy with permanent ureteric stenting. Overall, 88.8% of patients had urinary diversion, either via ileal conduit or cutaneous ureterostomy. The most common clinical manifestation of UAF was gross hematuria with or without clots accompanied by flank pain due to stent obstruction, while three patients presented with hypovolemic shock. Angiography represents the best option for diagnosis, followed by angioCT, with a sensitivity of 59.83% and 47.01%, respectively. There is no definitive imaging modality associated with high accuracy in detecting UAF and negative findings do not exclude the disease. In emergency cases with massive bleeding, surgical exploration remains the most appropriate management option for both diagnosis and treatment. Endovascular stent graft placement is preferred over open surgery in stable hemodynamic patients. Conclusions: Uretero–arterial fistulas represent a life-threatening complication and must be treated with great awareness. Angiography represents the best modality for diagnosis, followed by computed tomography. However, there is no definitive imaging modality and, in some cases, open approach remains the only option for diagnosis and treatment.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term Results of Endovascular Stent Graft Placement of Ureteroarterial FistulaCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012
- Treatment of Ureteroarterial Fistula with an Endoureteral Stent GraftJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012
- Evolution from open surgical to endovascular treatment of ureteral-iliac artery fistulaJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2012
- Successful Management by Provocative Angiography and Endovascular Stent of Ureteroarterial Fistula in a Patient with a Long-term Indwelling Ureteral StentJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Arterioureteral Fistulas: Unusual Suspects—Systematic Review of 139 CasesUrology, 2009
- Arterio-Ureteral Fistula: 11 New Cases of a Wolf in Sheep’s ClothingJournal of Urology, 2008
- Ureteroiliac artery fistula: Diagnosis and treatment algorithmUrology, 2005
- Endovascular Management of Ureteral–Iliac Artery Fistulae with Wallgraft EndoprosthesesGynecologic Oncology, 2002
- Arterio-ureteral Fistula – a Systematic ReviewEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2001
- Ureteroarterial fistula: Case report and review of the literatureUrology, 1996