Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy

This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:

• Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes
  Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2015
• Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis
  The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2014
• Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing–generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data
  The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2014
• Accuracy of Implant Impressions for Partially and Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review
  The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2014
• Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions
  Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014
• Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for Implant Loading Protocols
  The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2014
• Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants
  Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2013
• Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes
  Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012
• Simple technique to transfer occlusal vertical dimension and articulate a definitive implant cast for a full arch implant prosthesis
  The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2008
• Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting
  The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2003