Curating models from BioModels: Developing a workflow for creating OMEX files
Preprint
Abstract
The reproducibility of computational biology models can be greatly facilitated by widely adopted standards and public repositories. We examined 50 models from the BioModels Database and attempted to validate the original curation and correct some of them if necessary. For each model, we reproduced these published results using Tellurium. Once reproduced we manually created a new set of files, with the model information stored by the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML), and simulation instructions stored by the Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language (SED-ML), and everything included in an Open Modeling EXchange (OMEX) file, which could be used with a variety of simulators to reproduce the same results. On the one hand, the validation procedure of 50 models developed a manual workflow that we would use to build an automatic platform to help users more easily curate and verify models in the future. On the other hand, these exercises allowed us to find the limitations and possible enhancement of the current curation and tooling to verify and curate models. Author summary Public repositories with models deposited using standard formats are an important activity in computational systems biology, which allows scientists to easily find, access, and reuse them to rerun simulations or derive new ones using compatible software or tools. Common standards and public repositories can facilitate the reuse and regeneration of computational biology models beyond the software originally used to perform the simulations. As an exercise to validate and correct the current curation, we examined a selection of models in the BioModels Database. For each model, we reproduced some published results in the corresponding papers by a certain software. Once reproduced we manually created a standard file package using the model and its simulation information stored in the standard formats. These exercises not only allowed us to develop a workflow that we would use to develop an automatic online platform to help users more easily curate models for existing or future databases and repositories but also allowed us to find the limitations and possible enhancement of the current curation and tooling to verify and curate models.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: PLOS ONE, 19 (12), e0314875.
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metformin Transport Rates Between Plasma and Red Blood Cells in HumansClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2021
- The effectiveness of quarantine of Wuhan city against the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19): A well‐mixed SEIR model analysisJournal of Medical Virology, 2020
- Transmission dynamics of the COVID‐19 outbreak and effectiveness of government interventions: A data‐driven analysisJournal of Medical Virology, 2020
- 3D gut-liver chip with a PK model for prediction of first-pass metabolismBiomedical Microdevices, 2017
- Geometric analysis of the Goldbeter minimal model for the embryonic cell cycleJournal of Mathematical Biology, 2015
- Insight into the correlation between lag time and aggregation rate in the kinetics of protein aggregationProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2010
- Determining Important Parameters in the Spread of Malaria Through the Sensitivity Analysis of a Mathematical ModelBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2008
- A model for the dynamics of human weight cyclingJournal of Biosciences, 2006
- Modelling of fluid-phase endocytosis kinetics in the amoebae of the cellular slime mouldDictyostelium discoideum. A multicompartmental approachActa Biotheoretica, 1995
- Kinetics of cortisol metabolism and excretion. A hypothetic model based on the cumulative urinary radioactivity in eight multiple pituitary deficient patientsThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1992