Connectionism and dynamic systems: are they really different?
Authors:
- 30 July 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Science
- Vol. 6 (4) , 378-391
Abstract
We propose that connectionism and dynamic systems theory are strong contenders for a general theory of development that holds true whatever the content domain. We illustrate, through our own career narratives, the origins of these theories in motor and language development. We situate connectionism and dynamic systems among other classic and contemporary theories and conclude that, although there are meaningful differences, these differences pale in relation to the shared assumptions about the fundamental processes and mechanisms of change.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional developmentDevelopmental Science, 1999
- Origins of language disorders: A comparative approachDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 1997
- The Post-Piaget EraPsychological Science, 1996
- Development of reaching during the first year: Role of movement speed.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1996
- Solving Bernstein's Problem: A Proposal for the Development of Coordinated Movement by SelectionChild Development, 1993
- Treadmill-Elicited Stepping in Seven-Month-Old InfantsChild Development, 1986
- Rhythmical behavior in infancy: An ethological perspective.Developmental Psychology, 1981
- Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fieldsBiological Cybernetics, 1977
- Genetic EpistemologyAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1970
- Stereotypic behavior and development.Canadian Psychologist / Psychologie canadienne, 1968