Nutrition issues in Codex: health claims, nutrient reference values and WTO agreements: a conference report
Open Access
- 15 February 2012
- journal article
- supplement
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 51 (S1) , 1-7
Abstract
Background: Codex documents may be used as educational and consensus materials for member governments. Also, the WTO SPS Agreement recognizes Codex as the presumptive international authority on food issues. Nutrient bioavailability is a critical factor in determining the ability of nutrients to provide beneficial effects. Bioavailability also influences the quantitative dietary requirements that are the basis of nutrient intake recommendations and NRVs. Health claims: Codex, EFSA and some national regulatory authorities have established guidelines or regulations that will permit several types of health claims. The scientific basis for claims has been established by the US FDA and EFSA, but not yet by Codex. Evidence-based nutrition differs from evidence-based medicine, but the differences are only recently gaining recognition. Health claims on foods may provide useful information to consumers, but many will interpret the information to mean that they can rely upon the food or nutrient to eliminate a disease risk. Nutrient reference values: NRVs are designed to provide a quantitative basis for comparing the nutritive values of foods, helping to illustrate how specific foods fit into the overall diet. The INL-98 and the mean of adult male and female values provide NRVs that are sufficient when used as targets for individual intakes by most adults. World Trade Organization agreements: WTO recognizes Codex as the primary international authority on food issues. Current regulatory schemes based on recommended dietary allowances are trade restrictive. A substantial number of decisions by the EFSA could lead to violation of WTO agreements.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- 26th Hohenheim Consensus Conference, September 11, 2010 Scientific substantiation of health claims: Evidence-based nutritionNutrition, 2011
- Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice GuidelineThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2011
- Scientific issues related to Codex Alimentarius goals: A review of principles, with examplesRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2011
- Primary Care–Relevant Interventions to Prevent Falling in Older Adults: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Evidence-based mechanistic reasoningJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2010
- IOF position statement: vitamin D recommendations for older adultsOsteoporosis International, 2010
- The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill's ‘guidelines for causation’ contribute?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009
- Passclaim*European Journal of Nutrition, 2005
- Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research DesignsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996