Policy Positions of Bureaucrats at the Front Lines: Are They Susceptible to Strategic Communication?
Authors:
- 26 May 2016
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Public Administration Review
- Vol. 77 (1) , 57-66
Abstract
It is well established that bureaucrats’ implementation of policies is influenced by their own policy positions, that is, their attitudes toward the given policies. However, what affects the policy positions of bureaucrats? This article focuses on whether the policy positions of bureaucrats at the front lines of government are susceptible to frames and cues embedded in communication. Based on the notion that bureaucrats often adhere to certain professional norms when developing their attitudes toward policies, the authors hypothesize that communication frames and cues that align policies with such norms move bureaucrats’ policy positions in favor of the policy. Results of four studies in European and American settings among mid‐ and street‐level bureaucrats show support for the hypothesized effect. They also show that aligning policies with dimensions outside professional norms is ineffective, possibly even producing opposite effects.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Policy Implications of Limiting Immigrant Concentration in Danish Public SchoolsScandinavian Political Studies, 2011
- Competing Rhetoric Over Time: Frames Versus CuesThe Journal of Politics, 2010
- Guerrilla Employees: Should Managers Nurture, Tolerate, or Terminate Them?Public Administration Review, 2009
- Rule Following and Discretion at Government's Frontlines: Continuity and Change during Organization SocializationJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2009
- Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy ImplementationJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2007
- Street-Level Bureaucracy Revisited: Frontline District Central-Office Administrators as Boundary Spanners in Education Policy ImplementationEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2006
- Controversies of Standardized Assessment in School Accountability Reform: A Critical Synthesis of Multidisciplinary Research EvidenceApplied Measurement in Education, 2006
- With Good Cause: Bureaucratic Discretion and the Politics of Child Support EnforcementAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1998
- Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist ApproachAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1989
- Emotional Conservatism: The Basis of Social Behavior?Contemporary Psychology, 1980