Another View on the Middle East Conflict Analysis
Open Access
- 3 September 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 8 (9) , 1545
Abstract
Decision making is a cognitive process for evaluating data with certain attributes to come up with the best option, in terms of the preferences of decision makers. Conflicts and disagreements occur in most real world problems and involve the applications of mathematical tools dealing with uncertainty, such as rough set theory in decision making and conflict analysis processes. Afterwards, the Pawlak conflict analysis model based on rough set theory was established. Subsequently, Deja put forward some questions that are not answered by the Pawlak conflict analysis model and Sun’s model. In the present paper, using the notions of soft preference relation, soft dominance relation, and their roughness, we analyzed the Middle East conflict and answered the questions posed by Deja in a good manner.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1D1A1B04032937, NRF-2018-07042748)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Another view on reduction of parameters in soft setsApplied Soft Computing, 2012
- Semantic decision making using ontology-based soft setsMathematical and Computer Modelling, 2011
- Soft set theory and uni–int decision makingEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2010
- Hesitant fuzzy setsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010
- Multi-criteria classification – A new scheme for application of dominance-based decision rulesEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2007
- A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach to decision making problemsJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2007
- Game theory and non-linear dynamics: the Parrondo Paradox case studyChaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2003
- Consensus system for solving conflicts in distributed systemsInformation Sciences, 2002
- Conflict analysisInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2002
- An inquiry into anatomy of conflictsInformation Sciences, 1998