Matrix Effect Variability in Urine Samples from Different Cohorts and Implications on LC-ESI-MS Mycotoxin Biomarker Analysis

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Matrix effects (ME) during LC-ESI-MS analysis are a commonly acknowledged issue for a variety of matrices and analytes. Although sample preparation techniques are steadily evolving to reduce ME, the complexity and variability of the urine matrix remain a challenge, especially for multi-analyte methods. To investigate the extent of ME implications on method performance and quantification, we used stable isotope-labelled standards (SIL-IS) of 11 mycotoxins to evaluate the magnitude and variability of ME in urine samples from two cohorts: Bangladeshi adult women (n = 50) and Swedish children of both sexes (n = 340). Significant ME differences were observed between the two cohorts for eight of the 11 mycotoxins. Additionally, intra-cohort ME variability turned out to be very high with interquartile ranges (IQR) above 15% for 14 out of 22 analyte-cohort combinations. Maximum IQR values were observed for sterigmatocystin in the Bangladeshi cohort (318%), strongly impacting quantitative results obtained with matrix(-matched) calibration. Further experiments on a small German cohort of four subjects, each providing four to five urine samples, revealed high variability of ME within each individual. Factors influencing ME were investigated, showing little to no impact of sex and a moderate impact of age for some analytes in the Swedish cohort. Nonetheless, especially the more polar analytes, showing stronger signal suppression, demonstrated clear correlation of ME with density and creatinine concentration of the urine samples. As a result, urine samples with very high or low density or creatinine values require careful handling in regard to sensitivity or quantification errors when matrix(-matched) calibration without SIL-IS is applied.
Funding Information
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST 211/1043-1 FUGG)
  • Naturvårdsverket

This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit: