Challenges and promises of big team comparative cognition
Authors:
- Nicolás AlessandroniNANicolás Alessandroni
- Drew AltschulDADrew Altschul
- Heidi A. BaumgartnerHBHeidi A. Baumgartner
- Marina BazhydaiMBMarina Bazhydai
- Sarah F. BrosnanSBSarah F. Brosnan
- Krista Byers-HeinleinKBKrista Byers-Heinlein
- Josep CallJCJosep Call
- Lars ChittkaLCLars Chittka
- Mahmoud ElsherifMEMahmoud Elsherif
- Julia EspinosaJEJulia Espinosa
- Marianne S. FreemanMFMarianne S. Freeman
- Biljana GjoneskaBGBiljana Gjoneska
- 18 December 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Human Behaviour
- Vol. 9 (2) , 240-242
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Embodied and Embedded Learning: Child, Caregiver, and ContextCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2023
- Comparative performance of orangutans (Pongo spp.), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), and drills (Mandrillus leucophaeus), in an ephemeral foraging taskAmerican Journal of Primatology, 2020
- Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: A meta-analysis of the object choice taskNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019
- The influence of reward quality and quantity and spatial proximity on the responses to inequity and contrast in capuchin monkeys (Cebus [Sapajus] apella).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2018
- The nature of prosociality in chimpanzeesNature Communications, 2016
- Factors influencing the different performance of fish and primates on a dichotomous choice taskAnimal Behaviour, 2016
- Studying the evolutionary ecology of cognition in the wild: a review of practical and conceptual challengesBiological Reviews, 2015
- What is comparable in comparative cognition?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012
- The Impact of Environment on the Comprehension of Declarative Communication in ApesPsychological Science, 2010
- On the Importance of Comparative Research for the Understanding of Human Behavior and Development: A Reply to Gottlieb & Lickliter (2004)Social Development, 2005