Response to Comment on "Multipartite Entanglement Among Single Spins in Diamond"
Authors:
- 27 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 323 (5918) , 1169
Abstract
Our study reported entanglement among single spins in diamond. Lovett and Benjamin argue that three of six described entangled states were not achieved. Here, we explain our choice of entangled states and discuss their importance for quantum information processing. We also show that the eigenstates discussed by Lovett and Benjamin, although formally entangled and routinely generated in our experiments, cannot be used to detect nonlocal correlations.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on "Multipartite Entanglement Among Single Spins in Diamond"Science, 2009
- Multipartite Entanglement Among Single Spins in DiamondScience, 2008
- Preparing, manipulating, and measuring quantum states on a chipPhysica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 2006
- Coherent Manipulation of Coupled Electron Spins in Semiconductor Quantum DotsScience, 2005
- Defining EntanglementScience, 2003
- Entangled Macroscopic Quantum States in Two Superconducting QubitsScience, 2003
- Entanglement between an Electron and a Nuclear SpinPhysical Review Letters, 2003
- Quantum oscillations in two coupled charge qubitsNature, 2003