Comparative Performance Assessment between Incompressible and Compressible Solvers to Simulate a Cavitating Wake
Preprint
- 1 August 2024
- preprint
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Abstract
The cavitating wake behind a wedge has been simulated employing both incompressible and compressible solvers with the purpose of comparing their performance. To develop the compressible solver, the ZGB cavitation model for incompressible flows has been modified to consider the compressibility effects. First, the equations of state for the vapor and liquid phases have been implemented. Then, a pressure limit and absorbing boundary conditions have been set to prevent a non-physical pressure field. To test the developed compressible solver, a series of verification tests have been conducted comprising a 1D sod cavitating tube and the cavitating vortex shedding behind a circular body at laminar flow conditions. After that, the incompressible and the validated compressible solvers have been applied to simulate the cavitating wake behind a wedge. The obtained results show similar predictions with the two solvers in terms of pressure, vortex shedding frequency and instantaneous and average vapor volume fraction profiles. Moreover, it is interesting to note that the components of the fluid force fluctuations on the body at the lowest frequencies, as predicted by both solvers, are indistinguishable. However, the higher frequency fluctuations of the forces tend to be better resolved and amplified when the compressibility is considered. Overall, both flow solvers have provided comparable cavitation phenomena, yielding results well aligned with experimental observations.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Version 1, 2024-08-01, Preprints
- Published version: Fluids, 9 (9), 218.
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Numerical assessment of the condensation shock mechanism in sheet to cloud cavitation transitionInternational Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2023
- Characteristics and dynamics of compressible cavitating flows with special emphasis on compressibility effectsInternational Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2020
- Multimodal partial cavity shedding on a two-dimensional hydrofoil and its relation to the presence of bubbly shocksExperiments in Fluids, 2019
- Efficient implicit LES method for the simulation of turbulent cavitating flowsJournal of Computational Physics, 2016
- Large Eddy Simulation of the transition from sheet to cloud cavitation over a wedgeInternational Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016
- Analysis and optimization of numerical sponge layers as a nonreflective boundary treatmentJournal of Computational Physics, 2012
- Prediction of cavitating flow noise by direct numerical simulationJournal of Computational Physics, 2008
- Numerical simulation of flows around two circular cylinders by mesh‐free least square‐based finite difference methodsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2006
- Fundamentals of Cavitation2005
- Numerical simulation of the unsteady behaviour of cavitating flowsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2003