Outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging fusion-targeted biopsy of prostate imaging reporting and data system 3 lesions
Authors:
- 20 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in World Journal of Urology
- Vol. 37 (8) , 1581-1586
Abstract
To evaluate the characteristics and histological outcomes in patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesions undergoing magnetic resonance imaging-guided fusion-targeted biopsy (MRIFTB). We retrospectively reviewed 138 patients with PI-RADS category 3 lesions classified using multiparametric MRI who underwent MRIFTB between May 2016 and March 2018. The study population included biopsy-naïve and patients with prior negative biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyzes were performed to determine significant predictors of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The definition of csPCa was set at Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4. Overall, 114 (82.6%) biopsied lesions were benign and 24 (17.4%) were identified as prostate cancer. Of these 24 lesions, 14 (58.3%) harbored csPCa. Peripheral zone (PZ) lesions were more likely to be associated with malignant disease than transition zone lesions (13.7 vs. 6.2%). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that age, PZ location, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (P < 0.05) were independent predictors of both PCa and csPCa. A non-negligible number of PI-RADS 3 patients harbor csPCa. Moreover, age, lesion location, and PSA density could be potential clinical predictors of PCa and csPCa. Physicians should be aware of the cancer prevalence of PI-RADS 3 lesions, as the use of the aforementioned factors can help in the decision-making process for these patients.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial reviewAbdominal Radiology, 2016
- Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy ResultsEuropean Urology, 2016
- PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2European Urology, 2016
- Evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) PI-RADS scoring system for assessment of extra-prostatic extension in prostatic carcinomaEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2015
- Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of referenceEuropean Radiology, 2015
- The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsyWorld Journal of Urology, 2015
- Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysisEuropean Urology, 2015
- A Prospective, Blinded Comparison of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging–Ultrasound Fusion and Visual Estimation in the Performance of MR-targeted Prostate Biopsy: The PROFUS TrialEuropean Urology, 2014
- International Variation in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality RatesEuropean Urology, 2012
- Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumorsCancer, 2004