A Tutorial on Chemometrics for Low Field NMR Relaxation Data Part 1: Preparing the Dataset & Optimizing Experiments
Authors:
- Luísa Souza AlmeidaLALuísa Souza Almeida
- Yuri FahlYFYuri Fahl
- Yves José de Souza SantosYSYves José de Souza Santos
- Isadora FenerichIFIsadora Fenerich
- Julia Marcolan TeixeiraJTJulia Marcolan Teixeira
- Luís Eduardo VitolanoLVLuís Eduardo Vitolano
- Matheus MarinhoMMMatheus Marinho
- Itamar RonenIRItamar Ronen
- Alberto TannúsATAlberto Tannús
- Licarion PintoLPLicarion Pinto
- Marcos Batista MachadoMMMarcos Batista Machado
- Etelvino NovotnyENEtelvino Novotny
Preprint
- 9 June 2026
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Low resolution at low field NMR (LF-NMR) also known as time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance is a powerful analytical technique that probes molecular mobility mostly through relaxation dynamics (T₁, T₂) and diffusion offering valuable insights into physical-chemical properties across diverse matrices. However, the effective interpretation of LF-NMR data, whether univariate (e.g., relaxation times) or multivariate (e.g., full relaxation curves), requires rigorous experimental planning and robust chemometric workflows. This tutorial, the first of a two-part series, provides a comprehensive guide to plan LF-NMR experiments as well as to prepare datasets for chemometric analysis. It begins by distinguishing univariate and multivariate data structures and outlining appropriate statistical approaches for exploratory, regression, and classification objectives. Key preprocessing strategies for both rows (samples) and columns (variables) are critically examined, emphasizing the importance of physically meaningful transformations over empirically driven, uncritical data manipulation. The tutorial further introduces design of experiments (DOE) as an essential tool for optimizing acquisition parameters and systematically evaluating their influence on data quality. There are presented two practical examples, including a 2² factorial design for oleogel solidification and a 3³ design for CPMG parameter optimization. The results demonstrate how a structured experimental planning enhances reproducibility, minimizes artifacts, and lays the foundation for reliable chemometric models. Ultimately, this tutorial underscores that robust chemometric interpretations depend not on post-hoc data manipulation, but on the integration of sound experimental design, careful preprocessing, and a deep understanding of the underlying physical phenomenaKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oleogel Preparation Methods and Classification2024
- Noninvasive Analyses of Food Products Using Low-field Time-domain NMR: A Review of Relaxometry MethodsBrazilian Journal of Physics, 2022
- Enhancing signal‐to‐noise ratio and resolution in low‐field NMR relaxation measurements using post‐acquisition digital filtersMagnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 2018
- Chemometric Analysis of NMR Spectra2018
- Physical structure and thermal behavior of ethylcelluloseCellulose, 2014
- Reflections on univariate and multivariate analysis of metabolomics dataMetabolomics, 2013
- Rapid analyses of oil and fat content in agri‐food products using continuous wave free precession time domain NMRMagnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 2011
- Ethylcellulose Oleogels2011
- Application of chemometrics to low-field1H NMR relaxation data of intact fish fleshJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1999
- Classic Maximum Entropy1989