Water availability, fundamental niches and realized niches: A case study from the Cape flora
- 14 May 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Austral Ecology
- Vol. 43 (6) , 696-705
Abstract
The ability of plants to survive drought or waterlogging constitutes an important niche parameter, which might be particularly significant in explaining species coexistence in the species‐rich and seasonally dry Cape Floristic Region of South Africa. However, the degree of physiological adaptation and specialization to these eco‐hydrological parameters (the fundamental niche) cannot be readily inferred from correlative studies based on species distributions and spatial variation in environmental parameters (the realized niche). We used an ex situ greenhouse experiment to compare the fundamental hydrological niches (different mean annual precipitation, rainfall seasonality and soil drainage) of six eco‐hydrologically divergent African Restionaceae species. Juvenile plants were subjected to six different watering treatments, ranging from no watering to waterlogging, to determine drought and waterlogging susceptibility and optimal growth conditions. We used the rate of biomass accumulation and survival rate as response measures. We found that species from dry and mesic (but well‐drained) habitats had optimal or near‐optimal growth at benign conditions (under which most restio species grow well). All species performed worse when droughted and died when not watered. Species from dry habitats tended to perform better (assessed in growth) than species from wet habitats under droughting. Species from wet habitats performed best when waterlogged, whereas species from dry habitats performed very poorly when waterlogged – thus showing that realized and fundamental niches covaried at the wet end of the hydrological gradient. We conclude that eco‐hydrological parameters are part of the fundamental niche, and fundamental and realized species niches are approximately correlated along them. The distribution of wet habitat species appears not to reflect their drought tolerance, suggesting that it may not be predicted by bioclimatic variables, but rather by soil drainage characteristics.Keywords
Funding Information
- Universität Zürich
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- A fundamental, eco‐hydrological basis for niche segregation in plant communitiesNew Phytologist, 2010
- Evolution and Ecology of Species Range LimitsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2009
- Experimental biogeography: the role of environmental gradients in high geographic diversity in Cape ProteaceaeOecologia, 2009
- Flooding Stress: Acclimations and Genetic DiversityAnnual Review of Plant Biology, 2008
- Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2003
- Plant responses to simultaneous stress of waterlogging and shade: amplified or hierarchical effects?New Phytologist, 2003
- Long‐distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from rootsPlant, Cell & Environment, 2003
- Changes in growth, porosity, and radial oxygen loss from adventitious roots of selected mono‐ and dicotyledonous wetland species with contrasting types of aerenchymaPlant, Cell & Environment, 2000
- Potential growth and drought tolerance of eight desert grasses: lack of a trade-off?Oecologia, 2000
- THE ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ROOTS AND PLANT RESPONSE TO SOIL FLOODINGNew Phytologist, 1987