Field estimation of fallen deadwood volume under different management approaches in two European protected forested areas
Open Access
- 5 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
- Vol. 97 (5) , 762-770
Abstract
Fallen deadwood is essential for biodiversity and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. In modern forest management, there is growing interest in developing accurate and efficient methods for field estimation of deadwood volume due to its many benefits (e.g. carbon storage, habitat creation, erosion control). The most common methods for deadwood inventories are fixed-area sampling (FAS) and line-intersect sampling (LIS) methods. While the estimations of deadwood volume by LIS generally show results comparable to FAS estimations, active management (e.g. production forestry clearcutting, logging, and thinning activities) can impair LIS accuracy by changing local deadwood patterns. Yet, the comparison of LIS and FAS methods has typically focused on production forests where deadwood is limited and deadwood volumes are comparably low. In this study, we assessed fallen deadwood volume in two large national parks—one being a more actively managed landscape (including, e.g., selective thinning for maintaining cultural–historical values and enhancing recreational opportunities) with overall lower levels of fallen deadwood, and the other having a strict non-intervention approach with higher levels of deadwood. No significant differences between average FAS and LIS estimations of deadwood volumes were detected. Additional experimentations using simulated data under varied stand conditions confirmed these results. Although line-intersect sampling showed a slight overestimation and some variability at the individual plot level, it remains an efficient, time-saving field sampling method providing comparable results to the more laborious fixed-area sampling. Line-intersect sampling may be especially suitable for rapid field inventories where relative changes in deadwood volume rather than absolute deadwood volumes are of large interest. Due to its practicality, flexibility, and relative accuracy, line-intersect sampling may gain wider use in natural resource management to inform national park managers, foresters, and ecologists.Keywords
Funding Information
- Biospace
- European Research Council (834709, 397, H2020-EU.1.1)
- European Union’s Horizon 2020
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- The contribution of deadwood to soil carbon dynamics in contrasting temperate forest ecosystemsEuropean Journal of Forest Research, 2021
- Vegetation and disturbance history of the Bavarian Forest National Park, GermanyVegetation History and Archaeobotany, 2019
- Visitor Preferences for Visual Changes in Bark Beetle-Impacted Forest Recreation Settings in the United States and GermanyEnvironmental Management, 2017
- Forest Mensuration2016
- A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forestsEuropean Journal of Forest Research, 2010
- National Forest Inventories2010
- Review of indicators and field methods for monitoring biodiversity within national forest inventories. Core variable: DeadwoodEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009
- Deadwood in Relation to Stand Management and Forest Type in Central Apennines (Molise, Italy)Ecosystems, 2008
- Deadwood volume assessment in the third Swiss National Forest Inventory: methods and first resultsEuropean Journal of Forest Research, 2007
- Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory1986