Safety and performance of the Micra VR leadless pacemaker in Chinese patients: a post-market, prospective, observational, non-randomized study
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 April 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Cardiology Plus
- Vol. 11 (2) , 111-117
Abstract
Background and purpose: The real-world safety and performance of the Micra VR leadless pacemaker have been well-established by previous clinical trials. However, there is little clinical data from these studies specific to patients in China. The purpose of this study was to characterize the safety and performance of the Micra VR leadless pacemaker in a Chinese cohort. Methods: The primary endpoints of the Micra Acute Performance Greater China (MAP China) study were acute (≤30 days post-implant) and 12-month major complication rate following implantation of the Micra VR leadless pacemaker. Electrical performance was characterized from the time of implant through 12-month follow-up. Patient baseline and procedural characteristics and major complications were compared to the China pre-market and global Post-Approval Registry studies. Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled and successfully implanted with the Micra VR system between June 2021 and October 2022 across 11 sites in mainland China. Average follow-up was 11.1 ± 4.1 months. One major complication was reported in 1 patient within 30 days from the time of implant for an acute and 12-month complication rate of 1.0% (95% confidence interval: 0.025%–5.446%). Risk of major complications was in line with the China pre-market and global Post-Approval Registry studies. Conclusion: The Micra VR leadless pacemaker had high implant success and low major complication rates in patients from China, in agreement with the China pre-market and global Post-Approval Registry studies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medtronic (Shanghai) Management Co., Ltd.
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Leadless pacemakers at 5-year follow-up: the Micra transcatheter pacing system post-approval registryEuropean Heart Journal, 2024
- How to implant leadless pacemakers and mitigate major complicationsHeart Rhythm, 2023
- Leadless Pacemaker With Acute but Transient Elevation of Lead Impedance and Pacing ThresholdCJC Open, 2022
- Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemakerEP Europace, 2022
- Leadless pacing with Micra TPS: A comparison between right ventricular outflow tract, mid‐septal, and apical implant sitesJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2019
- Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical controlHeart Rhythm, 2018
- Impact of operator experience and training strategy on procedural outcomes with leadless pacing: Insights from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing StudyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2017
- Thrombus formation at the tip of a leadless pacemaker causing multiple unnecessary repositioningHeart Rhythm, 2016
- A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Incidence and predictors of short- and long-term complications in pacemaker therapy: The FOLLOWPACE studyHeart Rhythm, 2012