Definition of Intertwin Birth Weight Discordance
Authors:
- Fionnuala M. BreathnachFBFionnuala M. Breathnach
- Fionnuala M. McAuliffeFMFionnuala M. McAuliffe
- Michael GearyMGMichael Geary
- Sean DalySDSean Daly
- John R. HigginsJHJohn R. Higgins
- James DornanJDJames Dornan
- John J. MorrisonJMJohn J. Morrison
- Gerard BurkeGBGerard Burke
- Shane HigginsSHShane Higgins
- Patrick DickerPDPatrick Dicker
- Fiona ManningFMFiona Manning
- Rhona MahonyRMRhona Mahony
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 118 (1) , 94-103
Abstract
To establish the level of birth weight discordance at which perinatal morbidity increases in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancy. This prospective multicenter cohort study included 1,028 unselected twin pairs recruited over a 2-year period. Participants underwent two weekly ultrasonographic surveillance from 24 weeks of gestation with surveillance of monochorionic twins two-weekly from 16 weeks. Analysis using Cox proportional hazards compared a composite measure of perinatal morbidity (including any of the following: mortality, respiratory distress syndrome, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, or sepsis) at different degrees of birth weight discordance with adjustment for chorionicity, gestational age, twin-twin transfusion syndrome, birth order, gender, and growth restriction. Perinatal outcome data were recorded for 977 patients (100%) who continued the study with both fetuses alive beyond 24 weeks, including 14 cases of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Adjusting for gestation at delivery, twin order, gender, and growth restriction, perinatal mortality, individual morbidity, and composite perinatal morbidity were all seen to increase with birth weight discordance exceeding 18% for dichorionic pairs (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9, P<.001) and 18% for monochorionic twins without twin-twin transfusion syndrome (hazard ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-4.3, P<.001). A minimum twofold increase in risk of perinatal morbidity persisted even when both twin birth weights were appropriate for gestational age. : The threshold for birth weight discordance established by this prospective study is 18% both for dichorionic twin pairs and for monochorionic twins without twin-twin transfusion syndrome. This threshold is considerably lower than that defined by many retrospective series as pathologic. We suggest that an anticipated difference of 18% in birth weight should prompt more intensive fetal monitoring.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Northwestern twin chorionicity study: testing the ‘placental crowding’ hypothesisJournal of Perinatal Medicine, 2006
- Fetal and Neonatal Mortality Among Twin Gestations in a Canadian Population: The Effect of Intrapair Birthweight DiscordanceAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2005
- Growth Restriction as a Determinant of Outcome in Preterm Discordant TwinsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Is Discordant Growth in Twins an Independent Risk Factor for Adverse Neonatal Outcome?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Size-discordant twin pairs have higher perinatal mortality rates than nondiscordant pairsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- The ninety-fifth percentile for growth discordance predicts complications of twin pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in the United States: the role of intrapair birth weight discordanceObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Birth weight discordancy in twins: New definition and standardEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1998
- Improved birth weight table for neonates developed from gestations dated by early ultrasonographyJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1997
- What is Twin Birthweight Discordance?American Journal of Perinatology, 1990