The role of emotion regulation in couples’ stress communication and dyadic coping responses
- 12 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Stress and Health
- Vol. 39 (2) , 309-322
Abstract
Partners’ ability to cope together in the face of stress—commonly known as dyadic coping (DC)—can promote individual and couple well‐being. However, little is known about the predictors of DC, including partners’ emotion regulation. This study examined (a) whether emotion regulation abilities are associated with partners’ DC responses, and (b) whether these associations are mediated by partners’ engagement in stress communication in a community sample of different‐gender couples (N = 239). Couples completed self‐report measures to assess their stress communication and DC responses (supportive, negative, and common DC) and six dimensions of emotion regulation (emotional awareness, acceptance, clarity, goal‐orientation, regulation strategies, and impulse control). Results from structural equation modelling analysis confirmed expected associations between stress communication and partners’ supportive and common DC responses. Additionally, only associations with women's emotion regulation emerged significant. First, women’s emotional awareness was associated with more supportive DC from men and common DC through increases in women’s stress communication. Second, women who endorsed emotional acceptance engaged in less supportive DC towards their partner. Third, women's goal‐orientation was associated with less supportive DC from each partner and common DC through decreases in men's stress communication. There were no associations with men's emotion regulation. Collectively, findings suggest that although women may manage their negative emotions in ways that are adaptive for their individual well‐being, these benefits may not always affect relationship functioning in the same way. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of the English Version of the Dyadic Coping InventoryMeasurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2014
- Dyadic coping in Latino couples: validity of the Spanish version of the Dyadic Coping InventoryAnxiety, stress, and coping, 2012
- The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage.Journal of Family Psychology, 2010
- Emotion regulation and intimate partner violence in newlyweds.Journal of Family Psychology, 2008
- Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fitPersonality and Individual Differences, 2007
- Stress and Coping Among Stable-Satisfied, Stable-Distressed and Separated/Divorced Swiss CouplesJournal of Divorce & Remarriage, 2006
- Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation ScaleJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2004
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Gender Differences in Relationship Awareness and Marital Satisfaction among Young Married CouplesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1992
- A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing ValuesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1988