Positive Deviance A New Strategy for Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance
Authors:
- Alexandre R. MarraAMAlexandre R. Marra
- Luciana Reis GuastelliLGLuciana Reis Guastelli
- Carla Manuela Pereira de AraújoCACarla Manuela Pereira de Araújo
- Jorge L. Saraiva dos SantosJSJorge L. Saraiva dos Santos
- Luiz Carlos R. LambletLLLuiz Carlos R. Lamblet
- Moacyr SilvaMSMoacyr Silva
- Gisele de LimaGLGisele de Lima
- Ruy Guilherme Rodrigues CalRCRuy Guilherme Rodrigues Cal
- Ângela Tavares PaesÂPÂngela Tavares Paes
- Miguel Cendoroglo NetoMNMiguel Cendoroglo Neto
- Luciana BarbosaLBLuciana Barbosa
- Michael B. EdmondMEMichael B. Edmond
- 2 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 31 (1) , 12-20
Abstract
Objective.: To evaluate the effectiveness of a positive deviance strategy for the improvement of hand hygiene compliance in 2 adult step-down units.Design.: A 9-month, controlled trial comparing the effect of positive deviance on compliance with hand hygiene.Setting.: Two 20-bed step-down units at a tertiary care private hospital.Methods.: The first phase of our study was a 3-month baseline period (from April to June 2008) in which hand hygiene episodes were counted by use of electronic handwashing counters. From July to September 2008 (ie, the second phase), a positive deviance strategy was implemented in the east unit; the west unit was the control unit. During the period from October to December 2008 (ie, the third phase), positive deviance was applied in both units.Results.: During the first phase, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 step-down units in the number of episodes of hand hygiene per 1,000 patient-days or in the incidence density of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) per 1,000 patient-days. During the second phase, there were 62,000 hand hygiene episodes per 1,000 patient-days in the east unit and 33,570 hand hygiene episodes per 1,000 patient-days in the west unit (P < .01). The incidence density of HAIs per 1,000 patient-days was 6.5 in the east unit and 12.7 in the west unit (P = .04). During the third phase, there was no statistically significant difference in hand hygiene episodes per 1,000 patient-days (P = .16) or in incidence density of HAIs per 1,000 patient-days.Conclusion.: A positive deviance strategy yielded a significant improvement in hand hygiene, which was associated with a decrease in the overall incidence of HAIs.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Controlled Trial Measuring the Effect of a Feedback Intervention on Hand Hygiene Compliance in a Step-Down UnitInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2008
- Three successful interventions in health care workers that improve compliance with hand hygiene: Is sustained replication possible?American Journal of Infection Control, 2008
- Evaluation of hand hygiene adherence in a tertiary hospitalAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2007
- Dissemination of the CDC's Hand Hygiene Guideline and impact on infection ratesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2007
- National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006, issued June 2007American Journal of Infection Control, 2007
- The power of positive devianceBMJ, 2004
- Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settingsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2002
- Family support after strokeThe Lancet, 2000
- Handwashing Compliance by Health Care WorkersArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- No Time for Handwashing!? Handwashing versus Alcoholic Rub: Can We Afford 100% Compliance?Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1997