A suboptimal array of options erodes the value of CAP ecological focus areas
Authors:
- Lovisa NilssonLNLovisa Nilsson
- Yann CloughYCYann Clough
- Henrik G. SmithHSHenrik G. Smith
- Johanna Alkan OlssonJOJohanna Alkan Olsson
- Mark V. BradyMBMark V. Brady
- Jordan HristovJHJordan Hristov
- Peter OlssonPOPeter Olsson
- Karin SkantzeKSKarin Skantze
- David StåhlbergDSDavid Ståhlberg
- Juliana DänhardtJDJuliana Dänhardt
Open Access
- 1 June 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Land Use Policy
- Vol. 85, 407-418
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- CAP:s
- ECODEAL
- STACCATO
- MULTAGRI
- becc
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale—Rethinking agri-environmental paymentsLand Use Policy, 2012
- Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2011
- The collective provision of environmental goods: a discussion of contractual issuesJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2011
- Influences of transaction costs in environmental policyEcological Economics, 2010
- An agglomeration payment for cost-effective biodiversity conservation in spatially structured landscapesResource and Energy Economics, 2010
- Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemesJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2009
- Optimal design of agricultural landscapes for pollination servicesConservation Letters, 2008
- Co-creation and the new landscapes of designCoDesign, 2008
- The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape contextJournal of Applied Ecology, 2006
- How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003