An Ethics-Based Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Assuring Responsible Use (Version 1.0)
Authors:
Open Access
- 27 September 2024
- report
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
Abstract
The rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has generated excitement regarding its potential benefits and concern over its ethical implications. Governments, corporations, and standards organizations have described ethical principles to direct GenAI's development and use; however, practical guidance for implementing these principles is limited. Addressing this gap is critical, especially considering the array of risks associated with GenAI, such as legal liabilities, privacy concerns, security threats, and potential misuse. Robust policies and procedures are critical to support responsible deployment of GenAI. This report examines Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)’s approach to promoting responsible GenAI use. Proposed initiatives include developing policies based on ethical principles, creating a governance process to review projects relative to those principles, and implementing onboarding processes for training staff. The governance framework described in this report adapts the structure and principles of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), traditionally used in human subjects research, for GenAI ethical review, providing oversight. Ethical principles guiding responsible GenAI usage include transparency and accountability, privacy, fairness, safety, security, and validity and reliability. To operationalize these principles, we propose forming a GenAI Assurance Council (GAC) that mirrors the IRB's structure. The GAC will evaluate GenAI projects across privacy, accountability, transparency, safety, security, fairness, and validity dimensions. Complementing policy and governance is AI literacy training to support staff understanding of GenAI's ethical implications. An initial training effort for AI Incubator Chat—a GenAI tool deployed at PNNL—showed promising results, underscoring the importance of clear guidelines and user accountability. Collaborative efforts and the dissemination of best practices are also discussed. The proposed GAC model and AI literacy training provide a blueprint for establishing ethical GenAI use and governance, offering practical tools to bridge the gap between ethical principles and real-world applications. The responsible integration of GenAI at PNNL entails a multifaceted approach involving policy development, ethical governance, and AI literacy training. The positive initial feedback and collaborative opportunities position PNNL to lead by example in GenAI's responsible use, reflecting a proactive stance in addressing the ethical, legal, and societal challenges associated with this emerging technology. PNNL's systematic and ethical approach to GenAI offers a model for other institutions to emulate, promoting safe and responsible technological advancements in the AI domain.Keywords
Funding Information
- USDOE (AC05-76RL01830)
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and PrivacyIEEE Access, 2023
- Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachAI and Ethics, 2023
- The uselessness of AI ethicsAI and Ethics, 2022
- Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review of Principles and Challenges2022
- A framework for assessing AI ethics with applications to cybersecurityAI and Ethics, 2022
- Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologiesInternational Journal of Information Management, 2022
- From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices2021
- Operationalizing AI ethics principlesCommunications of the ACM, 2020
- The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of GuidelinesMinds and Machines, 2020
- The global landscape of AI ethics guidelinesNature Machine Intelligence, 2019