Neuroaugmentation in the Management of Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Authors:
- Stephen I. EssesSEStephen I. Esses
- Craig PonderCPCraig Ponder
- Carl DʼagostinoCDCarl Dʼagostino
- Eduardo TanhuiETEduardo Tanhui
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 23 (9) , 1069-1072
Abstract
A report of two cases of severe sacroiliac pain that were resistant to conventional management techniques. Both patients had undergone lumbar fusion. This appeared to be a predisposing factor. To define the source of pain in these patients by performing a series of diagnostic blocks under fluoroscopic guidance to determine if these patients were candidates for neuroaugmentation. Mild to moderate sacroiliac joint pain can be managed conservatively with analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and physical therapy. Severe sacroiliac joint pain can be incapacitating and more challenging to manage. Fluoroscopically guided intra-articular local anesthetic-steroid injections, followed by joint manipulation, can be effective, intracapsular injections of glycerin, glucose, and phenol also may be beneficial in some patients. The use of neuroaugmentation to manage pain of synovial origin has not been reported previously. Sacral nerve root stimulation in particular has been used to manage urinary bladder dysfunction and pain, but not sacroiliac joint pain. Two patients with severe sacroiliac joint pain were treated by implanting a neuroprosthesis at the third sacral nerve roots. The patients had undergone lumbar fusion for back pain that developed as a result of work-related injuries. Stimulation was tried for 1 week with bilateral, percutaneously implanted, cardiac pacing wires at the third sacral nerve roots. Both patients experienced relief of approximately 60% of their pain during the trial period. Therefore, a neuroprosthesis (Medtronics, MN) was implanted permanently bilaterally at the third sacral nerve root in both patients. The use of analgesics was reportedly the same after implantation, but significantly more effective, and the patients' daily living activities were more tolerable. Two cases of refractory sacroiliac joint pain are reported that were managed with permanently implanted neuroprostheses at the third sacral nerve roots. The authors suggest that neuroaugmentation can be a reasonable option in selected patients with refractory sacroiliac pain.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preemptive Spinal Cord Stimulation Reduces Ischemia in an Animal Model of VasospasmNeurosurgery, 1995
- The Sacroiliac Joint in Chronic Low Back PainSpine, 1995
- Gamma-aminobutyric Acid Is Released in the Dorsal Horn by Electrical Spinal Cord StimulationNeurosurgery, 1994
- Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action.BMJ, 1993
- Release of segmental amino acid neurotransmitters in response to peripheral afferent and motor cortex stimulation: A pilot studyLife Sciences, 1991
- Treatment of chronic pain by epidural spinal cord stimulation: a 10-year experienceJournal of Neurosurgery, 1991
- Presynaptic effect of clonidine on unmyelinated afferent fibers in the spinal cord of the catNeuroscience Letters, 1986
- Presynaptic depolarization of unmyelinated primary afferent fibers in the spinal cord of the catNeuroscience, 1982
- The Anatomy of BackacheAnz Journal of Surgery, 1974
- A Consideration of the Pelvic Articulations from an Anatomical, Pathological and Clinical StandpointNew England Journal of Medicine, 1905