Theories of Human Nature in Mencius and Shyuntzyy
Author:
- D. C. LauDLD. C. Lau
- 1 February 1953
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
- Vol. 15 (3) , 541-565
Abstract
The problem of how human nature is constituted, we have good reason to believe, was current before Mencius and, from the time of Shyuntzyy onward, has been one of the central problems throughout the history of Chinese philosophy. The point at issue between Mencius and Shyuntzyy has traditionally been taken to be something like this. There is a thing called human nature, which is good according to Mencius, but bad according to Shyuntzyy. The same thing cannot be both good and bad at the same time, hence at least one of the two philosophers must be wrong. That this was how most thinkers of subsequent ages understood the position can be seen from the remedies they recommended. There were two ways of reconciling the conflicting views.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hsun-tzu on TerminologyPhilosophy East and West, 1951
- Hsün-Tzū On the Rectification of NamesT'oung Pao, 1924